ContemporaryAdvancedBook

The Theory of Communicative Action

Jürgen Habermas

Frankfurt School / critical theory

The major work of the most influential living heir to the Frankfurt School, and an ambitious defense of reason against the pessimism of his predecessors. Where Adorno and Horkheimer saw reason collapse into domination, Habermas distinguishes instrumental reason from 'communicative reason' — the rationality embodied in everyday speech aimed at mutual understanding. On this foundation he builds a theory of how the market-and-bureaucratic 'system' colonizes the 'lifeworld' of shared meaning, and a basis for deliberative democracy.

About the author

German philosopher and sociologist (b. 1929), the foremost second-generation figure of the Frankfurt School and one of the most influential thinkers of the past half-century. Habermas's work on the public sphere, communicative reason, deliberative democracy, and the constitution of Europe has shaped social theory, political philosophy, and law.

Synopsis

Habermas reconstructs social theory around communicative action — interaction oriented to reaching understanding through reasoned argument — distinguished from strategic, instrumental action. He argues that modernity has two faces: the differentiation of an efficient 'system' (economy and administration steered by money and power) and a 'lifeworld' of shared meaning, and that the pathology of modern life is the system's 'colonization' of the lifeworld. Communicative rationality grounds his later deliberative theory of democracy and law.

Core passage idea

Paraphrase · Modern copyrighted work

Habermas argues that reason is not merely instrumental: embedded in everyday communication aimed at mutual understanding is a 'communicative rationality' that can ground critique, democracy, and a defense of the shared 'lifeworld' against domination by money and power.

By locating a non-instrumental rationality in ordinary communication, Habermas rescues reason from the Frankfurt School's despair and grounds a theory of deliberative democracy. The 'colonization of the lifeworld' names how market and bureaucratic logics crowd out shared meaning and democratic will.

To avoid a bubble

Pair with the darker critical theory of Adorno and Horkheimer that Habermas is answering, with poststructuralists (Foucault) who doubt his faith in rational consensus, and with critics who find his account of 'ideal' communication utopian.

Reading note

Formidably difficult; read it with a guide, or approach Habermas first through his Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. It is the theoretical foundation of deliberative democracy.

Best paired with

Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment; Jürgen Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere.

Find this book

Search onlineSearch libraryBuy on Amazon