ClassicAdvancedPrimary text

The Division of Labour in Society

Émile Durkheim

Founding sociology

A founding work of sociology and a profound meditation on what holds modern society together. Durkheim asks how societies remain cohesive as they grow complex and individualistic, and answers that the division of labour itself generates a new kind of solidarity — 'organic' interdependence replacing the 'mechanical' likeness of traditional communities. But he warns that when this transition misfires, the result is 'anomie': a corrosive normlessness. Essential for thinking about community, modernity, and the social foundations of political order.

About the author

French sociologist (1858–1917), one of the principal founders of the discipline and the first to hold a chair of sociology in France. Through The Division of Labour, Suicide, and The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, Durkheim established sociology as a rigorous science of social facts, shaping the study of solidarity, religion, and modernity.

Synopsis

Durkheim distinguishes 'mechanical solidarity,' the cohesion of small traditional societies bound by shared beliefs and likeness, from 'organic solidarity,' the interdependence of modern societies bound by the division of labour. He argues the division of labour is primarily a source of moral solidarity, not just economic efficiency, but identifies pathological forms — above all anomie, the breakdown of regulating norms — that accompany rapid or unjust modernization.

Core passage idea

Paraphrase · Public domain

Durkheim argues that the division of labour binds modern society together through interdependence — an 'organic solidarity' that replaces the shared likeness of traditional communities — but that when it develops without adequate moral regulation, it breeds anomie.

By treating the division of labour as a moral and social bond rather than a mere economic fact, Durkheim founds a sociological account of solidarity — and names 'anomie,' the normlessness of a society whose old bonds have dissolved before new ones cohere. It is a key to modern debates over community and alienation.

To avoid a bubble

Pair with individualist and contractarian traditions (Hobbes, Locke, the utilitarians) that Durkheim argues cannot explain social cohesion, and with critics who find his organic functionalism too quick to assume that society tends toward integration.

Reading note

Dense but foundational; the contrast of mechanical and organic solidarity and the discussion of anomie are the core. Read it as the sociological account of the social bond, alongside Tönnies on community and Nisbet on intermediate institutions.

Best paired with

Robert Nisbet, The Quest for Community; Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.

Find this book

Search onlineSearch libraryRead freeBuy on Amazon