ModernIntermediateEssay collection

Rationalism in Politics

Michael Oakeshott

British conservatism

A major European conservative critique of politics as abstract technical planning.

About the author

English philosopher (1901–1990), the most distinguished British conservative thinker of the twentieth century. This 1962 collection of essays argues against 'rationalism' in politics — the belief that society can be governed by abstract technique and explicit doctrine alone. Oakeshott defends practical, traditional, tacit knowledge and a sceptical, non-ideological understanding of political activity as 'the pursuit of intimations' rather than the pursuit of blueprints.

Synopsis

A critique of rationalist politics and an argument for practical knowledge, tradition, and political humility.

Core passage idea

Paraphrase · Modern copyrighted work

Oakeshott criticizes the belief that politics can be fully governed by abstract technique.

This deepens conservatism beyond nostalgia: political knowledge is often practical, inherited, and tacit.

To avoid a bubble

Pair with Enlightenment liberalism or socialist planning arguments.

Reading note

Good after Burke for a modern British conservative voice.

Best paired with

Immanuel Kant, What Is Enlightenment?

Find this book