Skip to content
2023ContemporaryAdvancedBook

Liberalism Against Itself

Samuel Moyn

Intellectual history of liberalism

Moyn's provocative intellectual history argues that liberalism lost its nerve during the Cold War. Reading Isaiah Berlin, Karl Popper, Judith Shklar, Lionel Trilling, and others, he contends that the fight against totalitarianism led liberals to abandon their Enlightenment inheritance — perfectibility, emancipation, a hopeful philosophy of history — for a defensive creed of fear, limits, and damage control. A bracing left critique that indicts the very thinkers much of the modern liberal canon venerates.

About the author

American historian and legal scholar (b. 1972), a professor at Yale. Moyn writes on human rights, international law, and the intellectual history of liberalism and the left; his books include The Last Utopia and Not Enough. He is a prominent left-leaning critic of contemporary liberalism.

Synopsis

Originating in his Carlyle Lectures, Moyn's book portrays mid-century 'Cold War liberalism' as a narrowing of an older, more ambitious liberal tradition. In response to Stalinism and the fear of total politics, figures like Berlin, Popper, Shklar, Himmelfarb, and Trilling recast liberalism as the wary defense of the individual against power and ideology, severing it from Romanticism, Hegelian progress, and the promise of collective emancipation. Moyn argues that this self-amputation left liberalism without the resources to inspire, and helps explain its present exhaustion.

Core passage idea

Paraphrase · Modern copyrighted work

Moyn argues that Cold War liberals, terrified of totalitarian utopias, stripped liberalism of its older faith in emancipation and progress and left behind a fearful, defensive creed, a self-betrayal that still shapes liberalism today.

The book turns the canon against itself: the thinkers usually celebrated as liberalism's clearest defenders become, in Moyn's telling, the ones who hollowed it out. It reframes liberalism's present weakness as a wound it inflicted on itself.

To avoid a bubble

Pair with the Cold War liberals themselves, Berlin and Shklar above all, who would answer that fear of cruelty and suspicion of utopian history are hard-won wisdom rather than a failure of nerve, and with liberals who deny that hope and humility are opposed.

Reading note

Best read after the thinkers it indicts, especially Berlin's Two Concepts of Liberty and Shklar's Liberalism of Fear, so the critique lands. A left history of liberalism, not an anti-liberal tract.

Best paired with

Isaiah Berlin, Two Concepts of Liberty; Judith Shklar, The Liberalism of Fear.

Find this book

Search onlineSearch libraryBuy on Amazon