ContemporaryAdvancedBook

Democracy and Its Critics

Robert Dahl

Democratic theory / pluralism

The most thorough modern defence of democracy against its strongest critics. Dahl takes seriously the oldest objection — Plato's claim that the wise should rule, not the many — and answers it, then builds a rigorous account of what an ideal democratic process actually requires and how real 'polyarchies' approximate it. The benchmark text for thinking carefully about democratic legitimacy.

About the author

American political scientist (1915–2014), Sterling Professor at Yale and one of the most influential democratic theorists of the twentieth century. Dahl coined the term 'polyarchy' for real-world representative democracies and spent his career analysing how power is actually distributed in them, from his classic study of New Haven (Who Governs?) to this late synthesis.

Synopsis

Dahl organises the book as a sustained argument with democracy's critics, ancient and modern. Against the 'guardians' who would entrust rule to the wise, he argues that no group can be trusted with unaccountable power and that citizens are the best judges of their own interests. He then specifies the criteria of an ideal democratic process — effective participation, voting equality, enlightened understanding, control of the agenda, inclusion — and assesses how actual democracies fall short.

Core passage idea

Paraphrase · Modern copyrighted work

Dahl argues that the case for entrusting government to a wise elite fails because no group can be trusted to rule others without being held accountable to them.

Dahl's reply to Plato is essentially about accountability rather than competence: even if some people really were wiser, handing them unchecked power over others is unsafe, because power without accountability corrupts and the rulers' interests will diverge from the ruled. Democracy is justified less by the crowd's wisdom than by the danger of its alternatives.

To avoid a bubble

Pair with Plato's Republic and modern advocates of epistocracy (rule by the knowledgeable) for the guardianship case Dahl is answering, and with elite theorists (Michels, Mosca) who argue democracy is always a façade for oligarchy.

Reading note

Long and systematic; the early chapters answering the guardianship argument and the later chapters specifying the criteria of the democratic process are the parts worth reading closely. A capstone text once you have the basics of the democracy debate.

Best paired with

Plato, Republic; Robert Michels, Political Parties.

Find this book

Reading paths that include Democracy and Its Critics